12 Angry Men
The jurywoman that aspect the boy was non guilty was Juror #8 or indentified as David at the end of the film. I thought this juror was the go around one of the group. I belief he was the best because he kept and open mind the livelong time. He lis decennaryed to what others had to say, and he didn’t let his emotions take oer and was on time for the case. The only mistake I find that Juror #8 made was when he went an investigated the case on his own. He went to the pawn shop by the boy’s house that sold the same knife found at the crime scene. Juror #8 I belief was the best juror of the jury.
I thought this Juror was a actually important part of the case and jury. The other juror I decided to talk about is Juror #3. He was the real last man to change his vote to not guilty. This is rattling important part of the film because Juror #8 convinced one by one with help by the others he had already convinced to persuade the others why he was not guilty. Juror #3 was a very mulish man, and he did not keep an open mind during the trial. He nowadays thought he was guilty, and related to his personal life. He contumaciously didn’t control his emotions because throughout the film he apply a lot of emotion.
He didn’t listen very well; instead he was being very stubborn only wanting to believe what he wanted to believe.
in that location were a lot of mistakes made by the jury in this movie. Most of the mistakes had to do with listening, keeping an open mind and lordly their emotions. If I was the attorney I wouldn’t want a lot of the Jurors in this because they broke a lot of the ten rules a juror should do. In the end of the film I belief they made the right decision by persuasion not guilty. They took in the evidence and finally listened to each other, and capable up their minds a little to consider what the right opinion was for this boy.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment