Oedipus, antogone, and media

ANALYTICAL ACCOUNT OF A streak THEME         “All those who were meant to wipe out off return died: those who believed truth thing, those who believed the contrary thing, and even those who believed nonhing at only, yet were caught up in the web without knowing why.” This stimulate quote by denim Anouilh, author of Antig nonpareil, helped me choose extremity, atomic number 53 of the much interesting underlining themes in on the whole terzetto plays: Oedipus the King, Antigone, and Medea, as the topic for my paper. No way out how hard the protagonists or antagonists in each play move to change the chance of the protagonists, they failed and agglomerate took over the chain of events. When existence try to change that which is beyond their control, they often fail and bump off the matters even worse than in advance as evince by the authors of the trey plays.         When Oedipus was innate(p) to Laius and Jocasta, their comfort was interrupted by a horrible prophecy: Oedipus throw alone deplete Laius and hook up with Jocasta when he grows up. The mood in Thebes changed from rhapsodic to somber for the king chose to confirm his own son killed so that he could remain alive. Considering the accompaniment from Laius’ point of view, it is not exhaust to understand his actions moreover the specified fact that he well-tried to challenge urgency causes his actions to come out ironic and cynical. By tinkering with destine, Laius caused the decease of Jocasta, and Oedipus’ blindness and banishment in addition to the events caused by mountain. In Antigone, Anouilh portrayed Creon in a similar way as Sophocles portrayed Laius. They both contributed more damage than benefit to the protagonists and their families with their “ surly intentions.”         When Antigone violated the law created by Creon and tried to bury the be of her familiar, Creon should have showed her to be killed decent away(p). Since he tried to sway Antigone to for affirm about the luggage compartment of her brother and attach his son, which was against her lot, his computer program did not work out. unrivaled might hypothesize Antigone, world of noble snag and having a chance to marry a prince, was out of her mind to chance her tone enchantment worrisome about a all in(p) body but Antigone’s fate was to die scrap for respect of her family. By delaying her death, Creon inadvertently caused the death of his wife and son. Jason tried to interfere with Medea’s fate and lost his life as well as the life of his loved ones.

        Medea’s fate was to die a noble woman with each of her enemies avenged. man escaping with Jason from Colchis, she contributed to the death of her stupefy and brother to save Jason. When both of them returned to Greece with their two sons, Jason, seeking power, go away Medea and married the king’s daughter. By doing so, he betrayed Medea so her fate had to step in and take over. Jason, his new wife, and Jason and Medea’s two sons lost their lives because Medea’s fate was avenging her betrayal.         In all ternary plays, the protagonists were of noble blood but even that did not stop disaster, those who were meant to die have died... Analyzing the trio plays, the tone of the three authors toward the audience deals with fate and victimisation imagery they suggest that fate can not be changed. The mere attempts to change fate proved to lead to tragedy as portrayed in the three plays. The greatest lesson one can take from analyzing the three plays from the prospective of fate is to leave it alone and accept the reason of the situation when it comes along. If you want to get a full essay, mark it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.