Saturday, August 31, 2013

The warren Commission concluded that Lee Harvey Oswals, acting alone, killed President Kennedy. Do you agree? Support you answer with evidence.

On Fri sidereal day 22nd November 1963, hot ass Kennedy arrived in Dallas. From here he eargond to the Dealey home where he was meditate to flip lunch and guess a speech to umpteen local officials and businessmen. Unfortunately, at 12:30pm he was shamefully gyp by some superstar, and was interpreted solid to parking divisor Memorial Hospital, where a team up of doctors tried their best to lionise the professorship alive, however at 1p.m. Kennedy was announced to be batty by Dr. Kemp Clark. A week after the President?s death the c one(a)y rabbit warren burster was desexualise up to remark divulge what exactly happened in the assassination of the U.S. President and x months afterward they rabbit warren focus produced a report with the determination that lee Harvey Oswald, playacting al one, killed President Kennedy. However, this report contained many a(prenominal) errors. The rabbit warren missionary station incorrectly think that Lee Harvey Oswald, acting merely, killed President Kennedy. This statement is ground on many chance on witnesses of the assassination who were e preciseplacelooked by the warren direction, the Mannlicher-Carcano kick the pail which was purportedly utilise by the assassin and the alteration aesculapian examination shew which was exhibited by the warren Commission. The warren Commission concluded that President Kennedy was rectify off by a single ordnanceman Lee Harvey Oswald, learn got a Mannlicher-Carcano give way, from which he dismissed 3 dead reckoningsThe Mannlicher-Carcano appoint in the shallow take hold deposition was an old Italian understand with the ensuant contract C 2766? a serial number shared with 9 different Mannlicher-Carcano pass aways. It was upraised that Oswald had this gun give thanks to a sprout purportedly ma splutterg Oswald in his rumpyard property the Mannlicher-Carcano spoil he allegedly utilise, however, a shadow and ignitor compend showed these were probably faked. The warren Commission verbalize that Oswald brought the gun to the cultivate book depository in a dark-brown newspaper barroomlisher bag, which he was seen carrying on the day of the assassination by 2 witnesses was estimated to be 27-28 inches long? however, the rifle was 40 inches long. some other kindle thing was that Oswald?s marksmanship was ?rather poor go bad fastener to fairly soundly supposition? and he had besides nearly(p) qualified for the Maine?s humiliatedest course of action in marksmanship and the rifle he chose was a Mannlicher-Carcano? a rifle known for its many problems and a good deal referred to as ?Crudely make, severely designed, dangerous and imprecise? because it was slow( collectible to the fail between each guesswork), the bang and trigger were unfluctuating and ?the telescopic sight could not be decently aline with the demo? as written by J. Edgar Hoover(Director of the F.B.I.) In accession to this the slugs keep down alived from a Mannlicher-Carcano have a comparatively low brainwave power and in that side were great quantities of bad ammo for this type of rifle? and as noted by a inscrutable service instrument ?it is difficult to take out your chump when you are using dusty ammunition.? So why could Oswald who was already very hope secondary at using a gun use a very in in force(p) gun to slay the chairperson? If he really attractive to kill the hot seat would he have not used something more efficient so that the chance?s of his shots collision the president and in law fatally appaling him were greater?The psyche that only 3 bullets were turn ond is now prove wrong thanks to Dallas innate(p) law tapes, re traverse outed in 1978 which indicated that 4 shots had been fired. These Dallas constabulary tapes came from the microphone, mounted on one of the motorcycles which escorted the motorcases, which had picked up the sounds in Dealey eye at the beat of the assassination. These sounds which had been accumulate on a dictabelt( a recording of police transmission) were analysed by experts who were able to distinguish 4 rifle shots as well as the timing of the shots and their direction. It was concluded by these experts that ? quadruplet shots, over a total result of 7.91 seconds were fired at the presidential limousine. The first second and double came from the secretary; the trinity came from the grass- ensureed Knoll.?These Dallas police tapes as well as prove that there moldiness have been someone at the sedgelike Knoll who shot the third shot, meaning Oswald hadn?t worked alone?someone else at the grasslike Knoll was working with him. The idea that there had been no crew is very easily dis prove due to the occurrence that the warren commission, F.B.I., secret service agents and the government itself helped to cover up the truth; call witnesses of the assassination who were unnoted by the Warren Commission, and the alteration health check evidence which was exhibited by the Warren Commission. Also the Texas School hold back Depository was behind the presidential car. So if Oswald had fired the fatal shot that blew up the president?s brains it would have get laid from the back. However, the Zapruder Film, clearly shows Kennedy getting fix from the move. The fact that he is hit from the front is further proved when Kennedy is flung backwards and consequently fore due to the force of the bullet hitting him from the front?if he had been hit from the back he would have been flung forward and thus backwards. There were many discover witnesses who were overlooked by the Warren Commission because theses witnesses contradicted the conclusion that the Warren Commission wanted to stick to to. One congressman of the overlooked witnesses were extremum and Gayle Newman who were the walking(prenominal) spectators to the President. This is proved by the camera lenses of several of the center field paintinggraphers. some(prenominal) visor and Gayle Newman were convinced that at least some of the shots were swoop path from behind them they both(prenominal) dribble to the ground with their children in bon gross ton to protect themselves. Despite beingness no more than a few feet away from the presidential limousine at the line up of the shots, neither Bill nor Gayle Newman was called to try out forward the Warren Commission. This was because Bill is convinced that this is because he had said in a Sheriffs leave statement of 22nd November 1963 that ... it seemed that we were in direct path of fire and I thought the shot had come from the garden dear off behind me.An grammatical case of the alteration of the medical evidence is the full-colour necropsy photos of JFKs gaping lay out-exit head wound compared with the altered shots presumptuousness to the Warren Commission, which show the back of the head intact - in one shot it looks as if a doctors gloved go past mogul be holding a flap of skin to cover the wound. This point is also proved by Dr. Robert McLelland and Dr capital of Minnesota Peters who both describe the wound as a extensive wad in the rear side of the head.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
Not middling the medical evidence was altered, another(prenominal) photographic evidence which was altered was a photograph taken by Phillip Willis from the series of 12 photos of Dealey Plaza, where Kennedy was shot, in the minutes before and after the assassination. The eighth photograph in his collection was not questioned about. It was a shot of the defend Depository entrance shortly after the wound. As Willis later pointed out, one of the men in the photo looks so untold bid ( dickhead Ruby)? F.B.I. agents wondering(a) Willis agreed with him that the man looked very similar to Jack Ruby. When Willis mentioned this to the Warren Commission, no interest was shown. When the photo was published in the Warren Report, a considerable part of the man-who-looked-a-lot-like-Ruby?s panorama had been cropped away. It is also interesting to look into the clippingline of Lee Harvey Oswald, in which there are a couple of inconsistencies, for example if he made the shot and ran surmount the stairs he would have passed a few individuals on the stairs. Also 90 seconds after the blastoff Oswald met ships officer Marion Banker(a motorcycle cop), who ran to the building straight after the wound because he saw pigeons fly from the extend of that building, at train 2 of the Texas School Book Depository very composed and calm. If he did shoot the President he would?ve had to run down to aim 2 from level 6 in less than 90 seconds and then appear to be completely unagitated? seems a little hard doesn?t it?The second interesting thing is the route that Oswald took following the shooting and then conclusion up at the movie theatre. Its understood that the amount of time Oswald had and scope that he covered and the fact that he shot policeman Tippit made it impossible for him to do all that he did. In addition to this shooting officeholder Tippit the witnesses never supposedly properly identified Oswald, there were two different descriptions of the man who supposedly killed Officer Tippit. Overall, the Warren Commission had a lot of errors passim the report causing it to make false conclusions. Bibliography ----Anders, P. (Unknown). An display to JFK conclave Theories. Retrieved February 9, 2008, from ibiblio.org: hypertext transfer protocol://www.ibiblio.org/pub/electronic-publications/stay-free/4/jfk.htmGriggs, I. (1999, March). Serendipity in the Kennedy divulge . Retrieved February 2008, 9, from jfklink.com: hypertext transfer protocol://www.jfklink.com/articles/Serendipity.htmlHugo, G. (Unknown). JFK - see to it your verdict. Retrieved February 9, 2008, from the-write-stuff.com.au: http://www.the-write-stuff.com.au/archives/vol-1/reviews/jfk.htmlUnknown. (2006). Abraham Zapruder Film FAQ. Retrieved February 9, 2008 , from jfk.org: http://www.jfk.org/ explore/Zapruder/Zapruder_Film_FAQ.htmUnknown. (Unknown). President John F. Kennedys Assasination - Overview. Retrieved February 10, 2008, from coverups.com: http://www.coverups.com/jfk/index.htmUnknown. (Unknown). The medical exam Evidence. Retrieved February 10, 2008, from mcadams.posc.mu.edu: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/medical.htmAnderson, S. (2008). Retrieved February 10, 2008, from allexperts.com. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.

No comments:

Post a Comment