The Implementation of Drug Education in Public & Private Schools

Gilham, S. A., Lucas., W. L., Sivewright, D. (1997). The impact of dose statement and prevention courses: Disparity between impressionistic and empirical assessments. valuation Review, 21(5), 589-613. This article presents an evaluation of the differences found between the staff's perception of drug prevention program effectiveness, and the youth's perception of program effectiveness.

Glass, S. (1997). Don't you D.A.R.E. The New Republic, 216(9), 18-28. This informant points out that the DARE program has been proclaimed to be ineffective, and presents opponent arguments from DARE spokesmen.

Gonnerman, J. (1999). Or D.A.R.E. The Village Voice, 44(14), 55-60. The efficacy of the DARE program from a police officer's point of view is discussed.

Gorman, D. M. (1997). The failure of drug education. The Public Interest, 129, 50. This article discusses the possibility

Kent. (1994). prenatal drug education in public and private civilizes of Neb. The daybook of School Health, 64(6), 254-259. Survey results regarding prenatal drug education be presented. Teachers (n-290) responded anonymously regarding categories of substance abuse being taught.

Riley, R. W. (1996). Teachers: A parapet against drugs. Teaching Pre K, 27(3), 6. Survey results regarding the impact that teachers can have on prevention of drug and alcohol use with middle school students, are discussed.

Rappleye, W. C. (1996). For the future of our children: Police help prevent self-destruction. fiscal World, 165(5), 83. Efforts of the DARE program, to include over 25,000 officers in over 70% of all school districts, working with over 25 gazillion children to inform them of the dangers of drug use, are presented.

that drug education is ineffective. Studies are reviewed demonstrating that no empirical evidence is available to support the achiever of these socia
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.