Youth Crime, Youth Justice, Part 1

On Youth Delinquency and P bentingDespite the recent movement to get along rears more responsible for their sisterren s actions , there is almost no query on the fictitious character of parents in the juvenile court organization . This chapter leave review a research project that was undertaken by the American Bar Association , the only published larn of the role of parents . A critical review of this study will lay the foundation for the research questions and the methodology of this study . still most importantly , this expository will elucidate the role of parents in youth crime or juvenile delinquencies casesPARENTING AND RESPONSIBILITYAs I wee already mentioned in the history chapter , the bear witness of agnatic obligation laws in the United States during the 1980 s and 1990 s was influenced by the continued rise in juvenile violence and the inability of the traditional organization of juvenile justice to adequately address the problem (Lansing ,.23 . The nominate presented by various state legislatures was to protect the welfare of children and to humiliate juvenile crime by causing parents to be more diligent in the care and supervision of children (Lansing ,. 44 . As Howard Davidson (p . 111 argues , parents whose actions or indifference contribute to a child s unwarranted and destructive behavior must be held to a licitly appropriate standard of responsibility with civil and criminal sanctions (p .23 solely the question that needs to be addressed is what dictates a child s parentalresponsibility ? Researchers suggest various criteria that should be weighed upon before finding a parent responsible of neglecting parenting duties and therefore subject to parental responsibility laws . I will next address these factorsSharon Lansing , in a Public Policy Report , argues for three criteria that should be addressed when determining culpability . She first argues that parents must have knowledge of a child s prior misconduct .

When parents are aware that a certain behavior , such as petit thieving , has occurred before and fail to take action to bug it from happening again they become culpable for their child s behaviorSecondly , she argues that the indebtedness should be restricted to either the same or virtually similar future misconduct in for parents to know what he or she must guard against . If , for example , a parent restricts a child to his neighborhood in to prevent him from difference to the mall and stealing once again , and he therefore engages in an act of arson by burning stamp out the neighbor s shed , the parent should not be held credible under the law . If they continued to allow the juvenile to go to the mall unsupervised , even after several acts of larceny , they would then be liableFinally , according to Lansing , the parental occupation to be informed and provide constant supervision should be restricted to a limited clip period following the juvenile s initial violation , as an extended time period is perceived to be unreasonable . Lansing notes that violations that efficiency hold parents responsible would include curfew violation truancy , and some(prenominal) delinquency...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .