On one hand, both Freud and Jung had cases that oppose god. Freud aphorism religion as an illusion or neurosis, caused by subjugate sexual trauma. The important thing to smell is that this shows religion as explainable by psychology, showing it as something developed alone in the mind.
Jungs theories also have some parametric quantity for the statement. Jung presented paragon as an archetype. Jung claimed that our images of God are themselves archetypal, meaning mankind is born with the tendency to create images of a God, or other religious icons. To describe this archetype Jung used the term the God within referring to his view that God is an inner psychological experience, an grammatical construction of the collective unconscious. As we have this archetype this irradiates the need for a God of classical theism as well as a reason to believe in him as it is already provided in our own minds.
Following this theory therefore, the belief in the God of classical theism only exists due to the God archetype.
Although it is important to note that both Freud and Jung beliefs can also be used against the statement. Freud held that he saw usefulness in the belief of God; he felt it assisted in keep society composed. He believed that without the effect the religious belief in a God had on people, life would be in an inferior position and that it would be wrong to take God away from society despite the fact that he considered psychology to be superior.
Jungs thoughts and concepts could also go against this statement. Jung was openly able to recognize the near God may cause. He felt God gave a meaning to life, something that if humanity was...If you want to get a wide-eyed essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment