| Mean| N| Std. divergence| Std. wrongful conduct Mean|
cope with 1| Eadherencelevel| 4.6833| 30| 1.79190| .32716|
postEadh| 6.5167| 30| 1.18164| .21574|
duo 2| Cadherencelevel| 4.4583| 30| 1.67265| .30538|
postCadh| 5.1417| 30| 1.38298| .25250|
| | | | |
| | Paired discrepancys| | | | |
| Mean| Std. Deviation| Std. shift Mean| 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference| | t| df| Sig. (2-tailed)|
| | | | Lower| Upper| | | | |
Pair 1| Eadherencelevel| -1.83333| 1.74610| .31879| -2.48534| -1.18133| -5.751| 29| .000|
| postEadh| | | | | | | |
Pair 2| Cadherencelevel| -.68337| 1.25073| .22835| -1.15040| -.21634| -2.993| 29| .006|
| postCadh| | | | | | | |
| | | | |
The Sig. (2- tailed) value in this paired model test is 0.000. This value is less than .05. For of this, it can be concluded that theres significant difference amid the adherence levels of experimental group who was given medication updates by text messages and telephone calls and set mobile calendar alarms from the give group who was not given an updates regarding their medications.
25 Independent T-test
| Groups| N| Mean| Std. Deviation| Std. Error Mean|
Posttest| A| 30| 5.1417| 1.
38298| .25250|
| B| 30| 6.5167| 1.18164| .21574|
| | | | |
| | Paired Differences| | | | |
| Mean| Std. Deviation| Std. Error Mean| 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference| | t| df| Sig. (2-tailed)|
| | | | Lower| Upper| | | | |
Pair 1| Eadherencelevel| -1.83333| 1.74610| .31879| -2.48534| -1.18133| -5.751| 29| .000|
| postEadh| | | | | | | |
Pair 2| Cadherencelevel| -.68337| 1.25073| .22835| -1.15040| -.21634| -2.993| 29| .006|
| postCadh| | | | | | | |
The Sig. (2- tailed) value in this paired sample test is 0.000. This value is less than .05. For of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment