12 Angry Men is a be given well-nigh a jury of twelve people. The jury has to decide whether a teenage son is inculpative or unreserved of cleanup position his bring forth. In order to find him guilty they must(prenominal) pay back no reasonable doubt. The play starts tabu as the jury takes a vote, eleven guilty and angiotensin converting enzymeness innocent. It is without delay up to the eleventh juror who voted innocent to persuade the another(prenominal) eleven jurors to change their minds. The jurors dispute about the evidence, especially one exhi opus in particular, the jab used to labour the sons father. A clerk from a corner store had tell that the boy had bought the identical knife from him foregoing that day. They argue that this knife is in truth unique and that no one in the jury has seen one before and that it has to be the same knife the boy bought earlier that day. The jurors continue on disputing, that is until one of them pulls out the same postul ate knife and stabs it into the table. The jury argues a bit about how pitch a knife like that into the judicatory room is outlaw(prenominal) but then(prenominal) realize the bigger picture, that in that respect could be many people out there with the same knife.
This forthwith gives some reasonable doubt and shows that it could have been someone else who stabbed the father to death. other important piece of evidence was an elderly womans testimony. She had testified to that she saw the boy killing the man late at night plot of ground she was trying to sleep. One of the jurors then notices that while testifying, the old woman was rubbing her nose a lot- a common occasion for som eone who wears glasses to do. Another juror ! then adds on to this and says he... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment